Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Gill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8391PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The first paragraph of the appellant’s complaint alleges that Lorinda I. Gill filed her petition for the establishment of a ditch; that at the March term, 1879, of the board of commissioners of Huntington county, viewers were appointed ; that the viewers i-eported ; that the commissioners made, and entered of record, the following order: “The foregoing report having been filed, and notice of the same given according to law, proof of publication is now filed.

“James H. Marshall filed his answer, denying the public utility of the ditch, as well as all the allegations of the petition (H. I.) and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muncey v. JoestIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Houk v. BartholdIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hume v. Little Flat Rock Draining Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Applegate v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Pickering v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cauldwell v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API