Legal Opinion

Drake v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1953No. 34607, 34621PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The question for determination on the main bill of exceptions is whether there is sufficient evidence to authorize a jury to find that the plaintiff was using the loaned automobile with the “permission” of the insured within the meaning of the omnibus clause of the policy. Roy Drake, the plaintiff’s husband, testified that he took his own automobile to J. L. Weddington, Jr., Inc., to have certain repairs made thereon. Upon learning that the repairs would take some time, he inquired of the company’s agent if he might borrow one of the company’s automobiles to use while his own automobile was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Parks v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Hemphill v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. United States Casualty Co. v. Georgia Southern & Florida Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API