Meier v. Heckel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This appeal is from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend.
Respondents have also filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and such motion must be disposed of prior to any determination on the merits.
*330The single question before this court on the motion to dismiss the appeal is whether the notice of appeal was timely-made so as to vest jurisdiction in this court.
The chronology of events which occurred in 1959 is as follows:
On June 23, a judgment for defendants (after order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend) was entered.
On July 13 (i.e., 20…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Thomas v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Arthur v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Starpoint Properties v. NamvarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- MAIDES v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Prince v. Pletcher CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021