Legal Opinion

Meier v. Heckel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1960No. Civ. No. 24510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This appeal is from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend.

Respondents have also filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and such motion must be disposed of prior to any determination on the merits.

*330The single question before this court on the motion to dismiss the appeal is whether the notice of appeal was timely-made so as to vest jurisdiction in this court.

The chronology of events which occurred in 1959 is as follows:

On June 23, a judgment for defendants (after order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend) was entered.

On July 13 (i.e., 20…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Thomas v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Arthur v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starpoint Properties v. NamvarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. MAIDES v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Prince v. Pletcher CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API