Legal Opinion
State v. Apodaca
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1967No. 8372PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Interim Supp.1966), raised issues concerning (1) evidence of entrapment, (2) representation by counsel and (3) effective counsel. The motion was denied. His appeal raises the same issues.
Entrapment. The issue of entrapment was submitted to the jury. The jury resolved the issue by its verdict. By his motion defendant seeks to retry the issue of entrapment. He may not do so. State v. Selgado, 78 N.M. 165, 429 P.2d 363 (1967). A claim of entrapment does not state a basis for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MoserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Moss v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- Theodore Way v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ArchieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SimienNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Trujillo v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. WildensteinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.