Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Smalls

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 1, 2020No. 3:20-cv-05047Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 GREGORY GENE PHILLIPS, CASE NO. 3:20-CV-5047-RJB-DWC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR 12 v. AMEND 13 TIM SMALLS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Gregory Gene Phillips, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 16 rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed and screened Plaintiff’s Amended 17 Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court finds Plaintiff has failed to state a claim on all 18 claims other than the claim for excessive force claim, but provides Plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API