Legal Opinion

Miskell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1935No. 17336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The State relying upon appellant’s possession of recently stolen property as proof of his theft of a car, the case became one of circumstantial evidence, and in his brief appellant merely stresses the well-settled proposition that in such case the testimony must exclude every other hypothesis except that of the guilt of the defendant, and must lead the minds of the jury to a well-settled conviction of his guilt. The authorities cited in appellant’s brief merely support said well-settled proposition. Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API