Miskell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
The State relying upon appellant’s possession of recently stolen property as proof of his theft of a car, the case became one of circumstantial evidence, and in his brief appellant merely stresses the well-settled proposition that in such case the testimony must exclude every other hypothesis except that of the guilt of the defendant, and must lead the minds of the jury to a well-settled conviction of his guilt. The authorities cited in appellant’s brief merely support said well-settled proposition. Appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938