Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Viering

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.

The plaintiff contends that a letter to him from his aunt, Carrie T. B. Purinton, should have been admitted to probate as her last will and testament. The reasons of appeal from the decree of the Probate Court for the district of New Hartford to the Superior Court state that the letter was the last will and testament of Mrs. Purinton, duly executed according to law, without undue influence, fraud or mistake, and that the decedent was of sound mind at the time of its execution. The named defendant demurred to the reasons of appeal on the sole ground that the letter, which was annexed to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatheway v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  2. Jacobs v. ButtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  3. Utley v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Whitehill v. HalbingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Beardsley v. MerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McAdam v. SheldonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Moore v. BunkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Bezzini v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Waterbury National Bank v. Waterbury National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API