Legal Opinion

State v. Strong

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJonxsoN, J.

The defendant was prosecuted on the charge of unlawfully removing personal property from Foster County, on which there was, at the time he removed the same, a subsisting chattel mortgage, to one Ivoenig as mortgagee. He was found guilty and on motion an order was made granting a new trial. From this order the State appeals.

Defendant was charged with. unlawfully removing two horses and some cows. Section 10,248, Comp. Laws 1913, reads as follows:

'‘Every person having in his possession, or under his control, any personal property upon which there is known to him to be a subsisting lien, either…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. AlbertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. BronkolNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BraathenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Indiana Truck Corp. v. Hurry Up Broadway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. State v. GraberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. RamstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. McEnroeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API