Legal Opinion

State v. McEnroe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1938No. File No. Cr. 160PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNjjessle, J.

The defendant McEnroe was informed against on a-charge of violating subsection 3 of § 40 of chapter 94,' Session Laws 1931, which provides that a director, officer, agent or employee of any building and loan association who wilfully makes or concurs in mak ing or publishing any written report, exhibition or' statement of its affairs or pecuniary condition containing any material statement which is false, shall be guilty of a felony. The defendant was tried on this charge and a verdict of guilty was returned against him. lie moved in arrest of judgment but this motion was denied and judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BickfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Goodsill v. WoodmanseeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Gaulke v. TurnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. HeatonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hamre v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. BraathenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API