Legal Opinion

Howard v. National Copper Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1933No. 5128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

Some time in January, 1917, Thomas A. Howard, the plaintiff and appellant, borrowed from Isaac Brockbank, his brother-in-law, the sum of $150, and gave his promissory note as evidence of the obligation. To secure the note Howard indorsed and delivered to Brockbank certificate No. 94 of the Upper Canal Irrigation Company, for 18.7 shares of stock of said company. At the time of delivery the stock certificate was indorsed by Howard as follows:

“For value received I hereby sell, assign and transfer unto Isaac Brockbank-shares of the Capital Stock represented by the within…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Huntsman v. HuntsmanUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Garfield Banking Co. v. ArgyleUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gowans v. Rockport Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peoples Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API