Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Foster v. George Washington University Medical Center

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1999No. 97-CV-514Published

1ConcurrenceWagner, Chief Judge

I concur in the result reached by the court. However, in my opinion, the error requiring reversal includes not only the trial court’s decision to return the jury’s note without determining its contents, but also its failure to respond adequately to the jury’s earlier inquiry as to what to do if they determined that Foster did not make reasonable efforts to mitigate her damages. The original mitigation instruction had failed to inform the jury what effect a factual finding of a failure to mitigate should have on their verdict. In response to the note, the court simply instructed the jury only…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Murchison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. W. B. Moses & Sons v. LockwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924
  5. Edward M. Crough, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API