Legal Opinion

Marion v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1917No. 9111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for perjury; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright. July 19, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwokth, J.

In an indictment for perjury it must appear how and in what manner the testimony alleged to be false was in fact material in the trial of the issue when the testimony was delivered. Herndon v. State, 17 Ga. App. 558 (87 S. E. 812); Buff v. State, 17 Ga. App. 337 (86 S. E. 784); Broadwater v. State, 10 Ga. App. 458 (5) (73 S. E. 691). See also Askew v. State, 3 Ga. App. 79 (59 S. E. 311); Black v. State, 13 Ga. App 541 (79 S. E. 173); Hembree v. State, 52 Ga. 242. And in such an indictment an allegation that the defendant swore, “I have not cohabited with my wife or lived with her since she…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Askew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Ruff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Broadwater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Hembree v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API