Legal Opinion

Broadwater v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1912No. 3892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for perjury; from Bartow superior court — Judge Fite.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

Exception is taken to a judgment overruling a demurrer to a presentment for the offense of perjury. Without insisting too strongly upon the maxim that “Demurrer, being a critic, must itself be free from imperfections” (Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Swindle, 2 Ga. App. 550, 556, 59 S. E. 600), which in the present ease might be applied to at least one of the grounds of the special demurrer, we have fully considered-each of the objections sought to be presented.

1. It is insisted, in the first place, that the alleged lawful oath is not set out in the body of the indictment, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Swafford v. BerrongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Sistrunk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Booth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API