Legal Opinion
State v. Phinney
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1984No. 14308PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
HISTORY OF ACTION
This is a criminal appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress and a judgment of conviction for unlawful telephone calls entered by the Circuit Court, Fourth Judicial Circuit, on August 2, 1983. We affirm.
Appellant Brian Phinney was prosecuted for violation of SDCL 49-31-31, which forbids a variety of unlawful telephone calls, the information being filed May 6, 1983. A motion to suppress certain telephone identification procedures was filed on June 13, 1983. The motion was denied, the circuit court concluding that the identification was “not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Hugh MacLeod Pheaster, United States of America v. Angelo IncisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. FaehnrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. StuckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.