Legal Opinion

Nankervis v. Auto-Owners Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1993No. Docket 138245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief involving a no-fault insurance policy. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant under MCR 2.116(0(10). We affirm.

Plaintiff is defendant’s insured. She was injured when the car in which she was riding was struck by a vehicle whose driver apparently ignored a stop sign. Her husband was driving the vehicle in which she was riding.

Plaintiff collected $20,000 from the insurer of the other motorist. She then attempted to collect the $25,000 policy limit on her underinsured motorist coverage with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. StarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bianchi v. AUTO CLUB OF MICH.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. BoissonneaultMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. LydonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. Ken's ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API