Legal Opinion

In re Kipp

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 18, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from an order of a single justice removing Roy Frank Kipp from the office of attorney at law in the courts of this Commonwealth. Kipp makes essentially four arguments on appeal. He claims (1) that the disciplinary proceedings denied him due process because he was required to proceed without counsel at a time when he was ill, disabled or incompetent; (2) that he was entitled to a trial de novo; (3) that the Board of Bar Overseers (board) lacked jurisdiction over some of the complaints due to their staleness; and (4) that there is insufficient evidence of misconduct as an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of SaabMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. In the Matter of OrfanelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. In re LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. In re KarahalisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. In the Matter of OrfanelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API