Legal Opinion
CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY v. CONSUMER CREDIT RESEARCH FOUNDATION (Two Cases)
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 18, 2018No. S17G1676, S17G1677PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
303 Ga. 828
FINAL COPY S17G1676. CAMPAIGN FOR ACCOUNTABILITY v. CONSUMER CREDIT RESEARCH FOUNDATION. S17G1677. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA v. CONSUMER CREDIT RESEARCH FOUNDATION. NAHMIAS, Justice. In this case, the Court of Appeals held, based on its reading of this Court’s decision in Bowers v. Shelton,
265 Ga. 247
( 453 SE2d 741) (1995), that Georgia’s Open Records Act (ORA) prohibits the disclosure of all information that is not required to be disclosed based on the ORA exemptions listed in OCGA § 50-18-72 (a). See Consumer Credit Research Foundation v. Bd. of Regents…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berryhill v. Georgia Community Support & Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Griffin-Spalding County Hospital Authority v. Radio Station WKEUSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Undisclosed LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Smith v. Northside Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Harris v. Cox Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Kinslow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Gonzalez v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Consumer Credit Research Foundation v. Board of Regents of the University System of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Khalia, Inc. v. Daniel RosebudCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.