Legal Opinion

Lane v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. CC 93-73; CA A84805 (Control); CC 93-7; CAA84806; SC S42992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident, the issue involves whether the trial court properly gave the so-called “emergency” instruction to the jury. The trial court gave the instruction over plaintiffs’ objection, and the jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor. Plaintiffs appealed to the Court of Appeals, arguing that the evidence did not establish an “emergency” that would support giving the instruction. The Court of Appeals disagreed and held that the trial court did not err in giving the instruction. Lane v. Brown, 138 Or App 34, 906 P2d 821 (1995).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Beecher v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Harkins v. DoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Weitzel v. WingardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Swanson v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jett v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Bjorndal v. WeitmanOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ryerse v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Cestaro v. State Ex Rel. Department of State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Bjorndal v. WeitmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API