Legal Opinion

Amann v. Office of the Utah Attorney General

District Court, D. Utah

Decided November 2, 2023No. 2:18-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH PAUL G. AMANN, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff, DENYING PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS v. OFFICE OF THE UTAH ATTORNEY Case No. 2:18-cv-00341-JNP-DAO GENERAL, SEAN REYES, BRIDGET ROMANO, and TYLER GREEN, in their District Judge Jill N. Parrish individual and official capacities, Defendants. Through this action, Plaintiff Paul Amann (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Amann”) asserts a number of claims against the Office of the Utah Attorney General (“AGO”) and Sean Reyes, Bridget Romano, and Tyler Green in their individual and official…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API