Avalos v. MMDEOL Incorporated
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01548-NONE-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR DEFAULT 13 v. JUDGMENT 14 MMDEOL INC., et al., FIVE DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently before the Court is George Avalos’ (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment. 18 Upon review of the motion, the Court finds the following deficiencies in the motion for default 19 judgment. Plaintiff shall be ordered to supplement the motion for default judgment to address 20 the issues identified in this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.