Lewisohn v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
In this appeal by the State from the Superior Court’s granting of petitioner Lewisohn’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, the function of the Law Court is a narrow one. First, if the single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, who sat by assignment in the Superior Court,* was cor rect in finding as a fact that a woman who sat on the jury that tried and convicted petitioner for murder 2 failed to reveal on voir dire that she had already made up her mind he was guilty, the State concedes — as it obviously must — that he did not get a fair trial. Second, that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- State v. LedgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Lang v. MurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Sturtevant v. Town of WinthropSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.