Oakley v. National Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSchencK, J.
Tbis is an action on a “special travel and automobile accident policy” issued to tbe plaintiff by the defendant. The issuance of the policy and the fact that it was in force and effect at the time plaintiff was injured by accident on 7 October, 1936, is admitted. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the policy insured against injury caused by the accident. It is the contention of the defendant that the policy did not so insure.
The policy provides that the defendant will pay to the insured certain benefits for disability resulting solely from bodily injuries effected “in consequence of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Shevlin v. American Mutual Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Helm v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- May v. . GroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Price v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Linder v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979