Legal Opinion

Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rs

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 28, 1939No. 3071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

The principal question for determination in the above entitled cause is whether public convenience and necessity require the operation of passenger trains numbered 291 and 292 on the Northern Pacific Railway between Helena and Garrison, Montana, and involves the validity of an ordfer of the Board of Railroad Commissioners of Montana denying the application of the plaintiff railway company for permission to discontinue said passenger trains. The validity of the order is challenged on the grounds that it deprives plaintiff of its property without due process of law and also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. NagleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1948
  2. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rs of StateDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1942
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1947
  4. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API