Legal Opinion
Capitol Hill Group C. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 2008No. Civil Action 07-1936 (RCL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court comes defendant Shaw Pittman’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the motion [4], plaintiff Capitol Hill Group’s opposition [34], defendant Shaw Pittman’s reply [37], the entire record herein, and applicable law, the Court will GRANT Shaw Pittman’s Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons set forth below.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Capitol Hill Group (“CHG”) filed suit against defendants Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP (collectively “Shaw Pittman”), in addition to their employees Paul A. Tummonds, Jr. and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- George, Diane v. Leavitt, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Payne v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust Ex Rel. Welt v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (In Re All American Semiconductor, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2010
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP v. Capitol Hill Group (In Re Capitol Hill Group)District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.