Legal Opinion

Spilman v. New Rockford Investment Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoiiNSON, J.

This is an action to recover $1,110.34, alleged to bo due plaintiff upon a contract entered into on the 19th day of February, 1921. No facts are alleged in the complaint showing the nature of the transaction. The defendant answered alleging in substance that on the 19th day of February 1921 the parties entered into an agreement in writing for the sale, by the plaintiffs, and purchase by the defendant, of a tract of land described therein; that the contract provided that a deed of quitclaim and an assignment of a contract for deed of the premises, executed to plaintiffs by one Julia Gulick,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoover v. PontzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Cross v. Buskirk-Rutledge Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kostenbader v. SpottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  4. Mullins v. AikenTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Brugman v. CharlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API