Legal Opinion
Skaggs v. City of Keller, Tex.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 13, 1994No. 2-93-261-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
A.G. Skaggs and Jackie L. Skaggs (the Skaggs) appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of a condemnation proceeding for want of prosecution. We affirm.
On September 15,1992, the City of Keller, Texas (Keller) filed a petition in condemnation, seeking through eminent domain proceedings to condemn 1.674 acres of the Skaggs’ property for public use. The trial court appointed three special commissioners, who set a hearing on the amount of the Skaggs’ damages for October 27, 1992. See Tex.PROP.Code Ann. § 21.014 (Vernon 1984). After the hearing, the special commissioners assessed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Mesquite v. Bellingar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Gordon v. Conroe Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tigner v. City of Angleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- James B. Bonham Corp. v. the City of Corsicana, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Charles C. Laidley and Dorothy Laidley v. City of San Marcos, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- James B. Bonham Corp. v. the City of CorsicanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.