Legal Opinion

Complaint as to the Conduct of Sandblast

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

L. B. Sandblast, an attorney duly licensed to practice in the courts of the State of Oregon, was found guilty of professional misconduct by a duly constituted trial committee of the Oregon State Bar. The findings and conclusions of the trial committee were approved by the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar, who have recommended that the accused be permanently disbarred.

The complaint is based upon the actions of the accused arising out of the probate of the estate of George Petrow, deceased. The accused was retained by Frederick L. Petrow, son of the deceased and administrator of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. ThorNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BlackOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HannonOregon Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API