Legal Opinion
Paul D. Asmus v. United Airlines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 2, 2026No. 5:26-cv-00962Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 PAUL D ASMUS, Case No. 5:26-cv-00962-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 UNITED AIRLINES, INC., [Re: ECF No. 7] 11 Defendant. 12 13 Defendant United Airlines, Inc. (“United”) moves to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Paul D. 14 Asmus’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 7 (“Mot.”); 15 ECF No. 14 (“Reply”). Mr. Asmus opposes the motion. ECF No. 13 (“Opp.”). The Court finds 16 the matter suitable for decision without oral…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.