Legal Opinion
Westbrook v. City Of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 7, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00476Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SHERMAN WESTBROOK, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-476 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE CITY OF CINCINNATI, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Sherman Westbrook claims that Defendants Rasheen Jennings, Kenneth Dotson, and Brandon Dean (the Officers), violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive force when Jennings tased him during the course of an arrest, and Dotson and Dean failed to intervene. The Officers now move for summary judgment. And because Westbrook filed his response in opposition late, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.