Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. Kuhn

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2010No. 20100060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] A hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board recommended attorney Gerald A. Kuhn be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days and pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of $2,654.07 for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(a), Conflict of Interest, and 1.14, Client With Limited Capacity. Counsel for the Disciplinary Board urges this Court to accept the hearing panel’s recommendation. Kuhn objects to the hearing panel’s conclusions, arguing they are not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Determining there is clear and *197convincing evidence Kuhn violated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Board v. AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. LightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Guardianship of HockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board v. KirschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KuhnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. PelzlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. LucasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API