Moore v. Washita Valley Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
This is an action for damages based upon fraud, it being alleged by plaintiff that on May 8, 1933, she had on deposit in the defendant bank a sum in excess of $1,500, and that on that date the defendant Burkett, president of the bank, fraudulently obtained said amount by inducing her to sign a check therefor. -The trial judge sustained the defendants’ demurrers to the evidence, and plaintiff appeals.
There is no difficult question of law in the case, necessitating any extended discussion. The trial judge sustained the demurrers because by the plaintiff’s own testimony her action was barred by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Micco v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boyd v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941