Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Venhaus v. Hale

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 13, 1984No. 83-236PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P. A. Hollingsworth, Justice.

Don Venhaus, Pulaski County Judge, appeals from a denial of a writ to prohibit Pulaski Municipal Judge David Hale from ordering Venhaus to pay the fee of a Special Prosecutor in the amountof $16,125.00. Judge Hale, oneof several municipal judges in Pulaski County, issued an order September 14, 1982, finding that the regularly elected Prosecuting Attorney had disqualified in a criminal case involving William C. McArthur and appointing W. H. Dillahunty as Special Prosecuting Attorney to represent the state in Pulaski County Municipal Court. The order stated that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Baldwin Park v. StoskusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hilburn v. First State Bank of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Beaumont v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Cook, Comm. of Revenues v. Ark.-Mo. Power Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Duncan v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Gazaway v. Greene County Equalization BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Chem-Ash, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Miles v. SouthernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Venhaus v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. State v. J.B.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API