Legal Opinion

Baehr v. Union Casualty & Surety Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. James N. Slover, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

This action is based on a policy of accident insurance, issued to plaintiff’s'husband, in her favor. There was a verdict for plaintiff in the trial court, which was afterwards set aside on defendants’ motion and a new trial granted. Plaintiff thereupon appealed from that order.

It appears that the defendant Union Casualty & Surety Company issued the policy in June, 1903, and that afterwards the defendant Maryland Casualty Company assumed the former company’s obligations after the 31st of December, 1903. Plaintiff’s deceased husband received an injury on the 15th of July, 1903, and another…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bragg v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Glasgow v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Driskell v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Taylor v. Grand Avenue RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. BethelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Jackson v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Glen L. Wigton Motor Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Richardson Ex Rel. Richardson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API