Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO ENJOIN STATE COURT LITIGATION
BENNETT, District Judge.
The court is called upon here to decide whether to intercede in a race to the courthouse. In this ease, grain producers assert that the “hedge-to-arrive” contracts (“HTAs”) they entered into for the sale and purchase of grain constitute illegal futures contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-25, and that the propagation of the HTAs was done in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). Plaintiffs have named as defendants a futures commission merchant,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. Estate of RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000