Legal Opinion

Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided September 12, 1997No. C 96-3148-MWBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO ENJOIN STATE COURT LITIGATION

BENNETT, District Judge.

The court is called upon here to decide whether to intercede in a race to the courthouse. In this ease, grain producers assert that the “hedge-to-arrive” contracts (“HTAs”) they entered into for the sale and purchase of grain constitute illegal futures contracts under the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-25, and that the propagation of the HTAs was done in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c). Plaintiffs have named as defendants a futures commission merchant,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  2. Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. Estate of RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API