Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip Ductan
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 2, 2015No. 14-4220PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published PER CURIAM opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote a separate concurring opinion.
2Per curiam
Phillip Ductan appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana (and aiding and abetting the same), and carrying a firearm during and in relation to those drug trafficking crimes, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, 18 U.S.C. § 2, and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Ductan contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when it (1) required him to proceed pro se after finding that…
3Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Joseph ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Shahid MuslimCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.