Vargas v. Metzger
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The reasoning upon which appellant’s claim of illegal confinement is based begins with the conclusion that the effect of Furman v. Georgia (1972), 408 U. S. 238, renders void Ohio’s first degree murder statute, R. C. 2901.012, in its entirety.
Although Furman is difficult to interpret, since in that decision nine justices wrote variously in concurrence and dissent, with five concurring in the additional brief per curiam, the net result is that when one is on trial for his life, and discretion rests in the trier of facts as to whether the defendant is to be executed or granted life…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. ShoemakerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Carr Johnson v. Harry RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Langston v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1973