Legal Opinion

O'Rourke v. German Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1906No. Nos. 14,877—(38)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

In an action to recover upon a policy of insurance, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and' the defendant thereafter moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The court granted the motion for judgment and denied the motion for a new trial. On appeal to this court the order of the district court was reversed and the cause remanded with leave to the defendant to renew the motion for a new trial. 96 Minn. 154, 104 N. W. 900. The defendant thereupon renewed its motion for a new trial upon grounds which had not previously been stated. The present appeal is from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Uhrig v. . Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Bishop v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hickerson & Co. v. Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Chapman v. Rockford InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kavli v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Steinhilber v. Prairie Pine Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API