Legal Opinion

State v. Mriglot

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1977No. 44332PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

Petitioner Jack E. Mriglot (hereinafter referred to as defendant) was convicted of first-degree forgery for feloniously uttering a check upon which he knowingly forged the payee's endorsement with intent to defraud. He appealed the conviction to the Court of Appeals, assigning as sole error the trial court's failure to give the following involuntary intoxication instruction proposed by defendant:

If a person is involuntarily under the influence or affected by the use of liquor or drugs, he is excused from any criminal act committed while in said state of intoxication.

The Court of Appeals found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. State v. TwitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. MriglotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. United States v. F.D.L. (Juvenile Male), United States of America v. R.L.R. (Juvenile Male)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API