Legal Opinion

Unsell v. Sisk

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Delta. Tried below before Hon. J. F. Holmes.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

Appellee sued appellant TJhsell, as constable, and the sureties on his official bond; also A. & J. Katz & Co., J. A. Smith and Arthur Darvin on an indemnity bond, executed and delivered to said Unsell to indemnify him against loss for the levy of a writ of attachment issued in a suit of Katz & Co. v. Davis & Bruce. The writ of attachment was levied on property claimed by appellee. The suit is for damages alleged to have accrued to appellee for the wrongful seizure of plaintiff’s property. Upon trial judgment was rendered against all of the defendants.

Exceptions were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cabell v. Hamilton Brown Shoe CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. StalcupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Bell Cab Company v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Bell Cab Company v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API