Legal Opinion

Infante v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 28, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

SCHELL, Chief Judge.

Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, filed on February 9, 1998. At a hearing held on April 6, 1998, the court gave Defendants more time to brief the motion, and Defendants filed a Brief in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement on April 17, 1998. As will be discussed below, Plaintiff Shirley Infante (“Infante”) filed no response to Defendants’ Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant's argue in their motion that on December…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. S & a RESTAURANT CORP. v. LealTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Carolina Vasquez v. Alto Bonito Gravel Plant Corporation and Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Walden v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. In the Matter of Omni Video, Inc., Debtors. George Houston, Otr/california Stock Transfer and Daniel Lezak v. Floyd Holder, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Roanoke v. Town of WestlakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Three H Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
  3. City of Roanoke v. Town of Westlake, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  4. City of Roanoke v. Town of Westlake, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API