Legal Opinion
Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc. v. Binney & Smith Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 22, 1942No. Civil Action No. 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a suit under the patent laws and was instituted pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Declara*347tory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. 400. The plaintiff herein, Godfrey L. Cabot, Inc., the seller of the alleged infringing product, brought this suit for declaratory judgment on January 16, 1942. The intervenor herein, Cabot Carbon Company, the manufacturer of the alleged infringing product, applied for leave to intervene in this suit on April 20, 1942; the application may, for the purposes of this discussion, be regarded as having been granted as of that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Milwaukee Gas Specialty Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Alfred Hofmann, Inc. v. Knitting MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Piccard v. Sperry CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Galbreath v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Hukle v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Mitchell v. Public Service Coordinated TransportDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.