Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Morehead v. Reem

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 10, Calendar No. 35,492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover commissions claimed to be due him on life insurance policies written on the life of Charles S. Mott of Detroit, Michigan. Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Detroit branch manager of the Canada Life Assurance Company at Detroit, Michigan, July 30, 1924, to take effect August 1,1924, whereby plaintiff was to act as a life insurance agent. Plaintiff’s contract with the Detroit manager of the Canada Life Assurance Company provided that:

‘/During the continuance of this contract renewal commissions shall be allowed the agent on the renewal premiums. * *…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Locher v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. North Carolina State Life Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Scott v. Travellers' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Washington Life Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1912
  5. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. TeagueTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  2. Beers v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API