Legal Opinion

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Teague

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1922No. 240-3431PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, P. j.

In ground V of motion for rehearing by plaintiff in error it is urged that we committed error in our original opinion in holding:

“That the plaintiff was entitled to the commission on renewal premiums due prior to the termination of his contract but paid thereafter.”

The specific question of plaintiff’s right to such commissions was not expressly presented, since there was no allegation that defendant had collected any premiums other than in accordance with the terms of the policies under which they accrued; and our attention was not directed to this particular question. It was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Locher v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Washington Life Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1912
  3. Walker v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greer v. Hunt CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Stancliff v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Castle v. Lloyds Cas. InsurerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Wyatt v. Southwestern Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Parrish v. Washington National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API