United States v. Farran
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant Farran’s application for release pending appeal. After careful consideration of the applicable law, the memoranda of the parties, as well as the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that defendant’s motion should be denied for the reasons discussed below.
As a basis for his motion, defendant raises several issues:
1. Application of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 would violate the ex post facto clause of the Constitution.
2. The Court erred in limiting cross-examination of Eugenia Fairchild and Jhamie Waters.
3. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Glen Sutherland, Edward Maynard and Grace WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Francis Martin Giancola and Charles A. Pifer, IICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Albert Solomon Preston, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Henry VanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. ButlerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- United States v. MustakeemDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- United States v. RossDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- United States v. WilliardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.