Legal Opinion

McDonald v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1919No. 5607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law.

The transcript does not contain a complaint as a predicate for the information. Appellant, under the record, was tried on an information without a complaint. This would necessitate a reversal and dismissal of the prosecution. A misdemeanor in the County Court cannot be ■ prosecuted without a complaint as a predicate for the information. It may be, however, the clerk omitted to insert it in the transcript and the defect could be cured by legal procedure.

There is another question that requires a reversal of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API