Stacy v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Adultery is the offense; punishment fixed at a fine of one hundred dollars.
The prosecution is based upon complaint and information. The complaint was signed “S. E. Smith”. It contained no jurat. A motion to quash the information because of the absence of complaint sworn to as required by statute was overruled. The court permitted the amendment of the complaint by inserting the jurat without any proof that Smith had made the oath. A complaint reduced to writing and verified by affidavit before an officer authorized to administer oath is made by statute an essential…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Halbadier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Arbetter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Linvel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1981
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Shurbet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933