Legal Opinion

Bradfield v. Dewell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Kent. Injunction bill. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Tbis is an injunction bill. Tbe object is to liave the rights of complainant in the water-power of tbe Tliornapple river at Ada declared and protected, and certain obstructions which are said to be maintained by tbe defendants in tbe mill-race at that point removed.

Tbe bill was filed July 30, 1811. It sets forth that prior to July 19, 1858, one Samuel Clements was owner in fee-simple of a certain parcel of land particularly described, *12lying upon the Thornapple river, together with a grist mill and flumes erected thereon, with the first right of use of the water from the adjacent mill race…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newton v. Security National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Allott v. American Strawboard Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Karsner v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Callahan Co. v. Chickasha Etc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. W. P. Callahan & Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API