Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 21, 2001No. [P.C. No. 21, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

The petitioner in this application for leave to appeal to this Court under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act raises no question or questions that have not been previously decided by us adversely to his present contentions. All of the questions raised were properly decided by the court below, and all were amply considered except the one that follows.

He claims that the “Police of Baltimore Police Department” told him that they “would see that petitioner would be given leniency if he plead guilty * * * at the time of trial.” In Hamilton v. Warden, 214 Md. 633, Judge Henderson, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Dobson v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Edwards v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Edwards v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API