Legal Opinion

Conour v. Zimmerly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

January 15, 1934, plaintiff obtained a judgment by confession against defendants. On defendants’ motion the judgment was set aside and defendants were given leave to plead. February 27, they filed an answer alleging new matter and a counterclaim. Plaintiff did not reply within 20 days as required by subsection 3, Rule 8 of the Supreme Court rules. No formal entry of default was entered of record but on April 16 plaintiff filed a motion, supported by affidavit, asking that the default be vacated and that he be given leave to reply to defendants’ answer and counterclaim. The motion was allowed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gage v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. W. H. Purcell Co. v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Chicago Washed Coal Co. v. WhitsettIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Cozzens v. Chicago Hydraulic-Press Brick Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Neil v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spence v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  2. Evergreen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BarnardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Bogdan v. AusemaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API