Ex Parte Davis

HARPER, Judge.

It appears from the record that in June, 1910, appellant was arrested charged with theft and burglary. It is not apparent from the record whether he was first arrested on the charge of theft or burglar}', the only dates being given is that he had an examining trial for burglary on June 18, 1910, and was tried in the County Court on a charge of theft on June 20, 1910, and as the law gives him two da'vs after arrest before trial it would appear that he had been arrested on the theft charge at least two days prior thereto. So from the record before us, it reasonably appears that…